|
We call our
approach to Public Opinion Research “Decision Driven
Polling.” Our goal is to help clients collect and use public
opinion research to make critical decisions on how to allocate scarce
resources to generate the greatest possible return – the most favorable
change in public perceptions and the most beneficial behavioral outcome.
Following is a brief description of the proprietary methods we have
developed to help with public opinion and polling research problems.
FPi Message Planner™:
Message Planning and Testing – Setting Policy Priorities
Effective
communication with the public requires an motivating, clear message. The
message must be consistent with the desires of the public and must be in
a form that they can quickly understand.
FPi Public Opinion
Message Planning and Testing is a procedure designed to identify the
optimal public opinion message, the one message among all options that
will most likely cut though the clutter and move the most public
opinion.
We test all
possible message options against each other – using a sophisticated
“trade-off” methodology which most simulates the kinds of choices people
make everyday. The trade-off method forces the public to make difficult
decisions, and choose messages they find most motivating against all
other competitor messages.
In this way, every
message is tested against all other messages, for its ability to drive
public opinion to consider and act in ways beneficial to our client
organization or individual. This leads to the discovery of the optimal
public opinion message, and a rank ordering of every potential message.
Results are delivered for the total population and for key target
subgroups.
We use the same
“trade-off” approach for identifying public policy priorities.
There are a multitude of public policy options. Finding the options that
are most acceptable and desired by the public is our job. Our
methodology tests each policy option against all others, leading to a
rank ordering of policy options, starting with the optimal policy, the
one most acceptable or desired by the public.
Examples of the
Message Planning Trade Off Method
Who would you vote for
if the election were held today?
Person A who supports
a tax cut for middle income families, or
Person B who supports
an increase in the minimum wage, or
Person C who supports
cuts to balance the budget.
Which would most
motivate you to support Organization A?
They endorse the clean
water act, or
They endorse a traffic
bond issue, or
They endorse a gun
control initiative?
FPi Public Opinion
Persuasion Monitor™

Persuasion is a
process. Our Public Opinion Persuasion Monitor is designed to measure
each discrete step in the process. The process involves first Awareness
or Name Identification. The public needs to be aware of the person or
organization before they can think about or take action.
Once awareness is
establish, the public begins to form impressions. The public learns more
about the organization or person. Though learning a public image is
developed. The public image includes facts and feelings, and overall
positive or negative attitudes and impressions toward the organization
or person.
After a public
image is established (and hopefully a positive one at that), public
opinion is then typically asked to consider a behavior that would
benefit the organization or person. This is called “Consideration” or
“Behavioral Intention,” which are very strong predictors of actual
behavior. The end goal of a persuasion campaign is to achieve high
levels of consideration and behavioral intention.
Our job is to
measure each of these steps in the persuasion process and identify
problems or “bottlenecks” that might exist. We then offer
recommendations for fixing bottlenecks at each stage in the process.
For instance, if
awareness is the problem, then the organization must get louder. If
there is awareness, but not enough positive impressions, then they
recommendation is to improve the message. If consideration is the
problem, then the organization or person needs to do a better job in
highlighting a motivating difference.
Segmentation and Targeting: Identifying the Optimal Solution
Who
are the best target groups for your message and for building a
coalition?

There are many ways
to segment and target public opinion subgroups. Voting propensity,
income, gender, party affiliation, age, education, race, attitudes,
lifestyles, psychographics, the possibilities often seem endless.
Indeed, just 5
possible groups and 5 ways to divide each produces 3,125 segments that
can be targeted! What is needed is a systematic and consistently applied
statistical methodology that can sift though the thousands of possible
combinations and identify the optimal way to segment, and the best
possible targets.
At FPi we have
developed statistical algorithms that sift though every possible
segmentation scheme and targeting option, and compare each to an
advanced set of criteria. The result is a segmentation scheme and
targeting recommendations that represent the best possible options for
achieving the organizations or individual objective.
Once the best way
to segment and the targets have been identified, all the information
available is used to present a complete profile of their demographics,
attitudes and behaviors, including how best to reach them.
Research to
Help Plan the Media Buy
Identifying targets
is just the first step; organizations and individuals need to
communicate with them to move public opinion. As part of the
segmentation analysis, we profile targets based on media habits and
other communication vehicles.
We can also build a
statistical model from this information, which will yield a Return on
Investment analysis. This analysis compares the costs of communicating
with the target, the number of impressions and/or exposures, and the
potential gains that may be achieve. A complete understanding of the
returns of every possible media mix option against each of the targets
is then provided. This will help organizations and campaigns buy media
and build a cost-effective media mix.
Database
Modeling
“Birds
of a feather flock together.” This is also true of neighborhoods and
citizen public opinion attitudes and behavior. Citizens tend to hold
the same attitudes, and exhibit the same public behaviors as other
citizens living in the same neighborhoods. Thus identifying the voting
behavior patterns of neighborhoods will tell us a lot about the citizens
that live that neighborhood and how they might behave toward an
organization or individual’s message.
For any state,
county, district, zip code, census track or even a precinct, data is
available which can we will statistically model to understand the
attitudes and behaviors of citizens in the area. For instance, one of
the best sources of database information for public opinion research is
the voter registration records. Precinct voting records are “mined” for
patterns that will help maximize media buys, improve direct mail
response, and help plan GOTV campaigns.
Database modeling
is one of the newest forms of public opinion research. It involves
complete statistical modeling of large amounts of data (requiring lots
of computing power). It is also a form of “inductive” analysis, in which
meaning must be given to patterns of data. This requires a strong
background in public opinion research and the experience to understand
the potential meanings of data sets.
© 2005 Scott W. Flexo,
Ph.D. and Flexo & Partners, Inc. All Rights Reserved
TM Pending
|